ELC IN NEWS

Direct inquires to elc@law.harvard.edu

 

Gerrymandering Veniece Miller Gerrymandering Veniece Miller

Fighting for Wisconsin voters’ power

In Clarke v. Wisconsin, the Harvard Law Election Law Clinic fought to restore voting power to Wisconsin residents – and won. The state’s highest court agreed with the clinic’s argument: Wisconsin’s gerrymandered state legislative maps were non-contiguous, diluting the voting power of the state’s residents and preventing fair representation.

Read More
Local Elections Veniece Miller Local Elections Veniece Miller

Op-Ed: Local Elections Enshrined for the People

A study conducted by the Harvard Election Law Clinic, where researchers analyzed 16 New York counties, including Sullivan, Ulster, Orange, and Rockland, found that off-cycle (odd-year) elections significantly depressed voter turnout. This was true for all voters, but especially for voters of color and younger voters.

Read More
Racially Polarized Voting Veniece Miller Racially Polarized Voting Veniece Miller

RPV Near Me – Updated with Asian and American Indian/Alaska Native Estimates

The tool, RPVNearMe (developed by the Election Law Clinic at Harvard Law School and Christopher T. Kenny) provides estimates of racially polarized voting for every county in the country. Note that the tool only offers estimates for certain statewide and federal elections — i.e., not the local appraisal you would need for VRA litigation — but it still gives a guide to possible coalition voting.

Read More